Comments on: Best Current Practice for mail forwarding? http://peter.makholm.net/2007/08/29/srs/ Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:44:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Peter Makholm http://peter.makholm.net/2007/08/29/srs/#comment-18281 Peter Makholm Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:45:23 +0000 http://peter.makholm.net/2007/08/29/srs/#comment-18281 I've never dreamt of a solution which solves the worlds problems just becaus I do 10 lines of code. Sorry if I did imply that. I’ve never dreamt of a solution which solves the worlds problems just becaus I do 10 lines of code. Sorry if I did imply that.

]]> By: cstamas http://peter.makholm.net/2007/08/29/srs/#comment-18280 cstamas Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:41:44 +0000 http://peter.makholm.net/2007/08/29/srs/#comment-18280 Even if you implement SRS most people will not. So mail is lost anyways. Forwarding is still broken BTW. Even if you implement SRS most people will not. So mail is lost anyways.
Forwarding is still broken BTW.

]]> By: Peter Makholm http://peter.makholm.net/2007/08/29/srs/#comment-18276 Peter Makholm Thu, 30 Aug 2007 05:51:23 +0000 http://peter.makholm.net/2007/08/29/srs/#comment-18276 <a href="http://blog.madism.org/index.php/2007/08/29/136-postfix-and-srs" rel="nofollow">Pierre Habouzit answered on his blog:</a> <blockquote> Peter, it's fun you ask right now, because I happen to just be writing a SRS daemon for postfix, to be used as a tcp_table(5) canonical lookup table. It's part of my soon to be pfixtools (Postfix Tools), that you can grab on my git repositories. [....] </blockquote> Pierre Habouzit answered on his blog:

Peter, it’s fun you ask right now, because I happen to just be writing a
SRS daemon for postfix, to be used as a tcp_table(5) canonical lookup
table. It’s part of my soon to be pfixtools (Postfix Tools), that you can
grab on my git repositories.

[....]

]]> By: Peter Makholm http://peter.makholm.net/2007/08/29/srs/#comment-18275 Peter Makholm Thu, 30 Aug 2007 05:49:09 +0000 http://peter.makholm.net/2007/08/29/srs/#comment-18275 The de Boyne Pollard article is trying to argue for ignoring the problem. This will lead to mail lossage when I only serve as middle man. This isn't really a viable option, even though I proposed it in my post. SPF is there and people are using it - I just need a working workarround. The de Boyne Pollard article is trying to argue for ignoring the problem. This will lead to mail lossage when I only serve as middle man. This isn’t really a viable option, even though I proposed it in my post. SPF is there and people are using it - I just need a working workarround.

]]> By: cstamas http://peter.makholm.net/2007/08/29/srs/#comment-18266 cstamas Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:54:01 +0000 http://peter.makholm.net/2007/08/29/srs/#comment-18266 No one should use SPF in my opinion. Read this: http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/smtp-spf-is-harmful.html One should consider DKIM instead. No one should use SPF in my opinion. Read this:

http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/smtp-spf-is-harmful.html

One should consider DKIM instead.

]]>